|  |
| | | Great
May 30 2007 on content Capsula_nvidia |
This is really, really good... |
| |
| | | Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oct 25 2006 on content Dyndyn Gtk+2 Engine |
Hey, perhaps his name was tarnished (and IMHO it was not), but what I've been trying to tell (or better, explain to) you is that's the risk you take when releasing your software under GPL. Furthermore, you are using the same BS argument Jorg "cdrecord" Schilling used when he tried to relicence cdrecord claiming SuSe, Debian, Mandrake... tarnished his holy name by adding dvd recording capabilities to his programme. He went that far to claim they breached a GPL Preamble (sic!), whilst at the same time he continued offering his own dvd recording software under closed source licence! I implore you, get over this since your own excellence cannot be destroyed by few copycat works... |
| | | Re: More things
Oct 25 2006 on content Dyndyn Gtk+2 Engine |
Temper, temper, now, now... There's no need to shout, really. Actually, I have understood and interpreted your words perfectly, however you persist in failing to comprehend - you have already agreed, by using GPL, to reuse of your code - even in the case of it being utilised as mere repo for someone else's work... Your mention of M$ is pure doublespeak argument, since they would not be legally allowed to link your GPLed code with their proprietary libs (there's some sort of trap here, since libgtk+ is LGPL actually). You have every right to be mad in case any potential abuse should take place, but sadly (or luckily) that is not what happened... |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
