| Re: Re: Re: Branding problems
May 5 2008 on group Tired of Ubuntu Wallpapers! |
yeah you are probably right that it would not be in the spirit of linux to limit people on what they are allowed to upload. Personally I find branding very distasteful, though, and too many times it will ruin an otherwise excellent work of art.
In all, I agree 100% that anything ubuntu-related should be moved over to ubuntu-art =) |
|  | | Re: Branding problems
May 5 2008 on group Tired of Ubuntu Wallpapers! |
Amen brother! There is in fact ubuntu-art.org toward which everything ubuntu-branded should be submitted, but despite this group being the most visible group for two months (happy anniversary btw) people have still not figured that out. |
| | | Re: Nice, nice.
Apr 30 2008 on content Archy |
lol I was literally about to say the exact same thing when I refreshed and saw you beat me to it
Everything looks very slick although I'm also not to fond of the vista-ish window decor. Try designing your own, it will probably be better ;D |
| | | Re: two instead
Apr 23 2008 on group improved voting system |
I really like that idea. Sort of like the voting at rotten tomatoes, which is split between critics, "cream of the crop", and rt community. |
| | | Re: Re: brainstormin
Apr 22 2008 on group improved voting system |
I know that wasn't directly related to voting, but the point of voting is to distinguish the good from the bad. I think the tiered system could help make that more efficient. |
| | | Re: brainstorming
Apr 22 2008 on group improved voting system |
just an idea
but maybe separate artwork into different "tiers", with one for artwork from professional/experienced people, one for roughly intermediate level, and one for beginners who are uploading some of their first creations and might want more technique hints.
or possibly they could be divided into tiers of polished/finished uploads and beta/experimental project uploads. |
| | | not to dig up old
Apr 22 2008 on group Tired of Ubuntu Wallpapers! |
conversations, but my apologies greyhat. I was not really intending to attack open source, I was really just trying to push around an idea that might make the site better, or worse. In hindsight it was rather off topic for this group anyway. |
| | | Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Apr 14 2008 on group Tired of Ubuntu Wallpapers! |
ok
I had my filter set to above 60% so I wasn't really seeing what you are really talking about.
still I think its better to criticize constructively whenever possible then let people make the same mistakes -eg imitating windows >:(- over and over |
| | | Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Apr 14 2008 on group Tired of Ubuntu Wallpapers! |
are you agreeing with me?
people SHOULD justify who they vote for, at least with themselves, so that they can be sure they have a legit reason for their vote and just because they are "a fracking robot"
don't get me wrong, it would be ludicrously stupid to have everyone vote good; it would make no sense at all. but for someone to work hard on something only to be rated bad by people simply because he started a certain group, thats just childishness that should not be tolerated in a community of linux users. credit should be given where credit is due. |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
