-
 KDE-Apps.org Applications for the KDE-Desktop 
 GTK-Apps.org Applications using the GTK Toolkit 
 GnomeFiles.org Applications for GNOME 
 MeeGo-Central.org Applications for MeeGo 
 CLI-Apps.org Command Line Applications 
 Qt-Apps.org Free Qt Applications 
 Qt-Prop.org Proprietary Qt Applications 
 Maemo-Apps.org Applications for the Maemo Plattform 
 Java-Apps.org Free Java Applications 
 eyeOS-Apps.org Free eyeOS Applications 
 Wine-Apps.org Wine Applications 
 Server-Apps.org Server Applications 
 apps.ownCloud.com ownCloud Applications 
--
-
 KDE-Look.org Artwork for the KDE-Desktop 
 GNOME-Look.org Artwork for the GNOME-Desktop 
 Xfce-Look.org Artwork for the Xfce-Desktop 
 Box-Look.org Artwork for your Windowmanager 
 E17-Stuff.org Artwork for Enlightenment 
 Beryl-Themes.org Artwork for the Beryl Windowmanager 
 Compiz-Themes.org Artwork for the Compiz Windowmanager 
 EDE-Look.org Themes for your EDE Desktop 
--
-
 Debian-Art.org Stuff for Debian 
 Gentoo-Art.org Artwork for Gentoo Linux 
 SUSE-Art.org Artwork for openSUSE 
 Ubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Ubuntu 
 Kubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Kubuntu 
 LinuxMint-Art.org Artwork for Linux Mint 
 Frugalware-Art.org Artwork for Frugalware Linux 
 Arch-Stuff.org Artwork and Stuff for Arch Linux 
 Fedora-Art.org Artwork for Fedora Linux 
 Mandriva-Art.org Artwork for Mandriva Linux 
--
-
 KDE-Files.org Files for KDE Applications 
 OpenTemplate.org Documents for OpenOffice.org
 GIMPStuff.org Files for GIMP
 InkscapeStuff.org Files for Inkscape
 ScribusStuff.org Files for Scribus
 BlenderStuff.org Textures and Objects for Blender
 VLC-Addons.org Themes and Extensions for VLC
--
-
 KDE-Help.org Support for your KDE Desktop 
 GNOME-Help.org Support for your GNOME Desktop 
 Xfce-Help.org Support for your Xfce Desktop 
--
openDesktop.orgopenDesktop.org:   Applications   Artwork   Linux Distributions   Documents    Linux42.org    OpenSkillz.com   
Xfce-Look.org - Eyecandy for your Xfce-Desktop
Xfce-Look.orgXfce-Look.org

 May 16 2024  
 Not logged in  
Xfce-Look.org
 Home    Add Artwork   Forum   Groups   Knowledge   Events   Jobs   Users   Register   Login-

-
- Poll . 

Why don't you report bugs?


Posted by Yaba on Jul 31 2006
YabaYaba
editor
Home
bugs.kde.org is too slow3%3%3% 3%
bugs.kde.org is not usable enough15%15%15% 15%
No time for reporting bugs.6%6%6% 6%
Most bugs are not very critical and I can live with them.21%21%21% 21%
I am too lazy41%41%41% 41%
Hey! I always report all found bugs!15%15%15% 15%
Votes: 701
-

 More specifically...

 
 by logixoul on: Jul 31 2006
 
Score 50%

While I do in fact report all bugs I find in KDE, they first stay on a queue which now has 185 bugs. In this queue every bug consists of a one-line description, which I can write whenever I want for less than half a minute. However, I actually start releasing the reports into the public tracker only when I feel I have the time and patience to go through the tedious process.

To tell you frankly, the queue doesn't stop growing; I add, like, 3 bugs a day, but I report 3 bugs a week. bugs.kde.org really needs to be rethinked. And Sebastien Laout already did so, but his very good suggestions for a bugs.kde.org reform were rejected. Too bad I can't find where they were, so as to support him.

I voted "not usable enough".


Reply to this

-

 Re: More specifically...

 
 by jel on: Aug 5 2006
 
Score 50%

Agreed. Most of the bugs I've reported have languished for years now :/ That said, a few have been fixed, and it's obvious that KDE somehow progresses without addressing these things, which is hard to be really upset about :D


Reply to this

-
.

 Missing Option

 
 by DocTomoe on: Jul 31 2006
 
Score 50%

"Bugs/Wishlist items get ignored for eternity".


Well, at least some of them. See http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 , http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112819 or http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85615 ...


And that are just the first three of hundreds. Some bugs are just seen as a feature, see http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109938


I am a frequent bug reporter and a lunatic that works with beta-grade code as soon as it's out - but I get seriously frustrated when bugs, wishes and pleads get ignored or dismissed because the maintainer feels like it.


I do accept that KDE developers' ressources are limited. Questionable attitudes towards bug reporters, such as comments like "develop this for yourself" or "learn c++" are poisionous to more user participation in the KDE bug reporting process.


Again: I'd pay money for #1015 in REGULAR kde (got the patch working)


Reply to this

-

 Re: Missing Option

 
 by smileaf on: Aug 2 2006
 
Score 50%

I can see the developer's problem with the 109938 bug.
2 of the patches I have no clue what file they are suppose to patch.
the other 2 are ones that must be applied by hand.

all 4 are actually worthless to me and the amarok devs because I'd have to personally figure out how to make each change which is basically just the same as implementing it from scratch myself.


this comment has been leafed...
Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: Missing Option

 
 by DocTomoe on: Aug 3 2006
 
Score 50%

The problem I have with the 10998 bug is not wheter the patches are useable or not, but the more than annoying behaviour of amarok - I actually do hear some of those webradios, but I have to search them in ca. 20 stations I do not like, do not hear and would be more than glad to get rid of.

"People are dumb, don't give them choice, this actually is a feature.", the reason given for making the coolstreams read-only, is the Gnome way, and that's one aspect of what I called "suspicious attitude by developers".

BTW: IMHO, a bug tracker should be before all a pointer to problems, where "normal users" report problems they stumbles upon. It is kinda pretentious to expect syntactically perfect patches from bug reporters. This is what developers ought do: the actual thinking.

Do not misinterpret me: Most of KDEs developers are a wonderful bunch of people, and I appreciate every step taken to give normal users like myself a superior computing experience. I do accept that I am in no position to tell anyone of you what to do, code or eat next. I just want to make clear why lots of my peers have given up on reporting bugs - its the way they or their bugs are being handled.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Missing Option

 
 by polrus on: Aug 3 2006
 
Score 50%

yes many of my bugs are ignored .
http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=dpbasti@wp.pl

but what is really sad is that most of them are UNCONFIRMED but I can reproduce them easilly on other machines so probably nobody even reads my reports


Reply to this

-
.

 Not found any yet.

 
 by HawkEye4077 on: Jul 31 2006
 
Score 50%

Which is a fairly good reason for not reporting them :) If I find any then I'll most likely report them.


Reply to this

-

 IRC is easier

 
 by Dhraakellian on: Aug 3 2006
 
Score 50%

because mentioning bugs/crashes/etc. in #amarok is easier.

If a developer thinks that a bug report will help, I can then add one.


Reply to this

-
.

 No problem!

 
 by Emre on: Aug 5 2006
 
Score 50%

I've never tried to report a bug and don't know to do good or bad. So to say, i'am really happy with my bugy computing enviroment :)


SuSE and Others...
Reply to this

Add commentAdd commentall pollsSuggest new pollBack



-

Copyright 2004-2016 Xfce-Look.org Team  Legal Notice
All rights reserved. Xfce-Look.org is not liable for any content or goods on this site.
You can find our FAQ here.
All contributors are responsible for the lawfulness of their uploads.
Please send us a notice if you spot an ABUSE of the website.
Information about advertising in Xfce-Look.org.
Developers can use our public webservice interface. More information here: public api
For further information or comments on this site, please send us a message
Xfce is a trademark of the Xfce Project
Content RSS   
Events RSS